SCHOOL -- 1958 vs. 2008

 

SCHOOL -- 1958 vs. 2008

Scenario: 
Jack goes quail hunting before school, pulls into school parking lot with shotgun in gun rack.
1958 - Vice Principal comes over, looks at Jack's shotgun, goes to his car and gets his shotgun to show Jack.
2008  - School goes into lock down, FBI called, Jack hauled off to jail and never sees his truck or gun again. Counselors called in for traumatized students and teachers.  

Scenario: 
Johnny and Mark get into a fistfight after school
1958 - Crowd gathers. Mark wins. Johnny and Mark shake hands and end up buddies.
2008 - Police called, SWAT team arrives, arrests Johnny and Mark. Charge them with assault, both expelled even though Johnny started it. 


Scenario: 
Jeffrey won't be still in class, disrupts other students.
1958 - Jeffrey sent to office and given a good paddling by the Principal. Returns to class, sits still and does not disrupt class again.
2008 - Jeffrey given huge doses of Ritalin. Becomes a zombie. Tested for ADD. School gets extra money from state because Jeffrey has a disability. 


Scenario: 
Billy breaks a window in his neighbor's car and his Dad gives him a whipping with his belt.
1958 - Billy is more careful next time, grows up normal, goes to college, and becomes a successful businessman.
2008 - Billy's dad is arrested for child abuse.  Billy removed to foster care and joins a gang.  State psychologist tells Billy's sister that she remembers being abused herself and their dad goes to prison.  Billy's mom has affair with psychologist. 


Scenario: 
Mark gets a headache and takes some aspirin to school.
1958 - Mark shares aspirin with Principal out on the smoking dock.
2008 - Police called, Mark expelled from school for drug violations. Car searched for drugs and weapons  

Scenario: 
Pedro fails high school English.
1958 - Pedro goes to summer school, passes English, goes to college.
2008 - Pedro's cause is taken up by state. Newspaper articles appear nationally explaining that teaching English as a requirement for graduation is racist. ACLU files class action lawsuit against state school system and Pedro's English teacher.  English banned from core curriculum.  Pedro given diploma anyway but ends up mowing lawns for a living because he cannot speak English.  

Scenario: 
Johnny takes apart leftover firecrackers from 4th of July, puts them in a model airplane paint bottle, blows up a red ant bed.
1958 - Ants die.
2008- BATF, Homeland Security, FBI called. Johnny charged with  domestic terrorism, FBI investigates parents, siblings removed from home, computers confiscated, Johnny's Dad goes on a terror watch list and is never allowed to fly again. 

Scenario: 
Johnny falls while running during recess and scrapes his knee. He is found crying by his teacher, Mary.  Mary hugs him to comfort him.
1958 - In a short time, Johnny feels better and goes on playing.
2008 - Mary is accused of being a sexual predator and loses her job. She faces 3 years in State Prison.  Johnny undergoes 5 years of therapy, Johnny's parents hire a lawyer and sue the school for millions with a class action law suit for letting Johnny and his classmates engage in unsafe activities.

I Will NEVER Forget

I didn't get to post on Patriot's Day... I was doctor instructed, bed-ridden sick, and had absolutely no strength to do so. But, God willing, I do not intend to miss honoring the events, heros, and fallen patriots of that day next year; though I do so not just on September 11th...

I had always flown my American flag on the holidays and honor days we Americans should be proud enough to fly it. But now, I have flown it continuosly--alit at night--on my front porch every day since September 11th, 2001...

I will never forget.

Did your children know September 11th is now "Patriots Day"? Did you...

Martin Luther King Jr. was a Republican

Please Read, "A Covenant With Life: Reclaiming MLK's Legacy" by Dr. Alveda C. King. His own children might not profess it, but Reverend Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. was a Republican. Visit the National Black Republican Association website for a printable version of this article. http://www.nbra.info/

Re: FW: Another Good article from Townhall.com

Subject: Another Good article from Townhall.com

Saul Alinsky: the Puppet Master
by Burt Prelutsky
Link:
http://townhall.com/columnists/BurtPrelutsky/2008/09/19/saul_alinsky_the
_puppet_master
Or not....


Sometimes I think I may be developing ulcers, and it has nothing to do
with the way that the New York Yankees are performing this year or with
eating spicy food. It has everything to do with America's left-wingers.
I could probably learn to accept their being on the wrong side of every
single issue, but it's their lies and evasions that get my innards
rumbling like an espresso machine.
For instance, the other day I had occasion to send the following letter
to my local rag, the L.A. Times: "Dear Editor: On page 10 of the front
section, you ran an article sub-headed 'TV networks and newspapers deny
bias claims.' Obviously, yours was one of the newspapers doing the
objecting. However, on the very next page, at the end of an article in
which Jon Voight was quoted as saying that he hoped that more of his
Hollywood colleagues would come around to the McCain-Palin ticket, your
"reporter" couldn't resist adding, in parentheses: 'Some people might
argue that the Democrats in the entertainment industry have been
awakened by the selection of Palin. They're even more determined in
their support of Obama.'
"Confirming bias in the media," I concluded, "is easier than shooting
fish in a barrel. Sincerely, Burt Prelutsky."
Understand, dear readers, this wasn't an editorial or an op-ed piece.
This was supposed to be a news item, and a Times reporter was permitted
-- encouraged?-- to tack on a partisan comment, and yet the Times
vehemently denies that it or any other member of the left-wing MSM is
attempting to pass off political propaganda in the guise of objective
reporting.
But there are far more egregious examples. The latest being the way the
liberal hounds have jumped all over Sara Palin's pregnant daughter while
giving Obama a pass over his long-time friendship with the unrepentant
Weatherman terrorist, William Ayers.
Furthermore, has the MSM once mentioned the influential role that the
late Saul Alinsky played in the lives of leading Democrats, and how he
helped turned the party so far to the left that if men like Harry Truman
and John Kennedy came back to life, they would assume the Soviet Union
had won the Cold War?
Saul Alinsky, who died in 1972, at the age of 63, was a Chicago Marxist.
Among his many books was one titled "Rules for Radicals," in which he
explained to his acolytes, "The most effective means are whatever will
achieve the desired results." It took Alinsky 11 words to paraphrase
Karl Marx's far more succinct "The ends justify the means."
Alinsky, by the way, dedicated that particular book to Lucifer, whom he
coyly referred to as "the first radical."
The reason I'm bringing up Alinsky 26 years after he wound up in a place
where he could personally autograph his book for Beelzebub is because
his disciples are still very much with us. For instance, he just
happened to be the subject of Hillary Rodham's senior honors thesis at
Wellesley College. It was such a glowing homage that, in 1968, a most
appreciative Alinsky offered her a job in Chicago, but Ms. Rodham, as we
all know, had bigger fish to fry. However, when she became America's
First Lady, the White House asked Wellesley to restrict access to the
paper, and Wellesley wisely obliged, just as Princeton did when the
Obamas requested that Michelle's racist screed be removed from
circulation.
Many people, once they grow up, would be embarrassed if people knew what
they were drinking or smoking during their college days, but leftists
don't even want us to know what they were thinking.
But it wasn't just young Ms. Rodham who had a connection to the late,
unlamented Saul Alinsky. Thirteen years after the Chicago radical died,
a group of his most devoted disciples hired 24-year-old Barack Obama to
be a community organizer in South Chicago.

There Are Only Two Reaons To Be A Liberal Democrat

I can think of only two reasons why a person would be a Liberal Democrat. Neither are good.

1) You are stupid, and can't manage your own life--thus need third party intervention, like that of the government.

You need someone to tell you how to think. You can't do it for yourself. You make unwise choices. Can't control your own spending, or habits.
You need someone or something to define the parameters (...that means, "tell you how much", in case I'm using words too large to comprehend...) of what you can spend, or do... with the aspects of your life. How big a car you should drive--as if someone knows your family's activities and what best suites the transportation needs of your group. How cool you should set your thermostat--again, monitoring your state of being and what is best for your state of relaxation and comfort. (Funny, I thought even the liberal sucking media could no longer hide the now well known and (“ inconvenient”?) truth that known the biggest proponent of Global Warming taxation and legislation is a man who can cool 23 homes a month with the cost he pays to cool just one of his homes. "Mr. Gore for President", eh?) Or maybe you need them to tell you to stop eating Big Macs™ for a while and take the dog for a walk after a good, lean steak and a side of vegetables.

You want “the village” to raise your child. You want someone else to intervene in the personal or family concerns that might be affecting your child’s ability to learn in the same manner as another person’s child. You are unable to control the ways and doings of your children without government legislated controls, on even what types of physical activities they can best cope with; because you believe that a governing body knows better than your own child if they don’t mind the grueling effort if takes to play tackle football versus choosing table tennis. What, with all the controls in place your child cannot even participate in a three-legged race for someone’s (???) fear of injury for having fun!

2) And if not stupid, then you are non-trusting of others, prejudice, or probably a Racist. You are worried that, without a governing body or Government controls on people, you—and others like you—will not get their fair-share of whatever it is you seek. That opportunities will not be distributed with equality among men.

Keeping it just to America, you are sure that Americans controlling their own industries will act on a self-centered or biased nature that has them including and excluding persons of their choosing. That benefits, goods, services and wealth will be dis-equally distributed or made available, based on subjectivity.

The biggest historical cause for subjectivity in America has been racism and legislated Segregation. So why, then, if we trust men to their own judgment would you not expect to see prejudice and racism in the common man’s consciousness as his normal course of behaving and thinking? And with this country still majority White, Blacks and Hispanics are programmatically and systematically led to—by following the tenets and preachings of social, Liberal, Democratic thinkers and “leaders” who continually orate pessimist thinking—a belief that Whites will not be fair in their dealings with others therefore Government has to legislate and control the affairs of (these) men.

You are prejudice, and start your day on the premise that persons different than yourself are also prejudice of persons not like themselves; and that when you encounter them in your daily activities you can expect they will not treat you fairly. So you decide to interact with and support only those who are like yourself—therefore choosing your race, or perhaps your gender, as a first measure of whom to trust. You become a Racist.

As much as truth hurts, this is—and has been--the underlayment of Liberal and Democratic thinking for way too long. Trust, and faith in men, are never promoted among Liberal Democrats.

It took Republicans to start the defeat of this way of thinking, with men like President Abraham Lincoln. But now, 143 years later, the believer’s in his legislation have ensured an association with his political party’s name means you are out of touch with and unable to relate to the common American. They want to brand you an “Uncle Tom:, an “elitist”, “rich”, or White.

That Reverend Doctor Martin Luther King might have ever been a Republican unnerves Blacks who have been led to believe the Republican Party provides no support to their causes or concerns. And sadly, the Blacks who continue to believe this are willing to nominate and hope to elect a 2008 candidate for President of the United States who is the epitome of Liberal Democratic thinking. This presidential candidate is running on a platform that he will bring “change”.

The change that is needed is a movement away from membership in a political Party that promotes pessimism, as the Democratic party or being a Liberal does.

People, no matter how difficult the emotional challenge, must begin learning to think—and believe--for themselves, and stop making presumptions about others; but meet and know people individually and personally to grow relationships, especially between races.

No one is asking anyone to take away ethnic differences and become a uni-body of non-distinct thinking. This, of course, is the most wonderful aspect of American civilization—our diversity!

But as long as the Liberal Democratic rhetoric is lack of self-confidence, lack of trust, and constant discord I stay to my belief, that to choose to be a Liberal, or a Democrat, is limited to two reasons. And I’m glad I am neither.

“The Patriot”
September 7, 2008

Liberals, Blacks, and the Media Deny Plain Truth.

Liberals, Blacks, devout Democrats, and the media continue to deny the truth about having selected Barack Obama as their candidate for President, no matter the facts put right in their face. The truth is, he is the wrong candidate, and many have chosen him just because he is black.
It is an utter embarassment to see how many Blacks have such a lack of self-esteem that they choose Barack no matter his lack of credentials, no matter his openly racist positions--an institution the purport to oppose, no matter his tax-us-to-death policies--which they believe will not affect them; and, as if he is the last black man in America who could hold the position of President of this great country. With some polls showing upwards of 92 - 97% of Blacks voting for Barack, I am glad to be on of the "3%" who strongly states "I won't!"
I stay surprised at the apologist whites, who brushed aside the warnings and voted-in Barack, a racist who plans to tax the upper and middle-classed--mostly white (per census records)--as his way of repaying blacks for the "sins of the fathers"; the old rhethoric people of his affliation have unjustly supported for too long. These apologists might want to turn a blind eye, but I base my belief on the "proud" relationship Barack tells us he has with Jeremiah Wright--a follower of James Cone--both who teach continued hatred for White America.
What surprises me the most--being the same age as Barack Obama--is his suggestion through his memoirs that his life was a shattering trek through racial indifference and the suffering of persistent attacks against him by Whites; yet I recall experiencing nothing so traumatic having grown up in an overwhelmingly majority white, highly political populus of the country during the same time period he was growing up. Barack, Rev. Wright, and a whole host of other "minority leaders", and minority "celebrities" continue to slight, slander, and put-down current and new generations of Whites who had NOTHING to do with--nor feel inherently the same as their ancestors about--racial differences. Yet Barack is touted as the great reuniter? He is supposedly bringing "change"?
Liberals and devout Democrats know that Barack has the most liberal voting record in the US Senate. They must expect that with electing Barack they will have a shoe-in to support their agenda of continuing to demoralize and somehow punish America by taking away God, sanctity of religion, respect for unborn children, and certain American family values--like freedom of choice, and the continuation of our second amendment rights. They must beleive that he will continue to fight against we Americans whose goals are to maintain education--not socialization--in schools, to encourage a competitive spirit, and to encourage success. They must know and be glad that Barack will make sure the world sees American pride being diminished, and that he will promote that we should be ashamed to have become the greatest country on this earth.
There are so many other strong, Black, American leaders whom the Democrats could have "vetted" to become President of the United States of America. But these would be the blacks who have been ridiculed as being outside of the "typical" standard blacks have lately placed upon their so-called leaders. These would be blacks who suffered little or overcame any racial strife they may have faced; who didn't need government assistance to feed and house themselves or their family; who succeeded in the American corporate structure by way of their ability--as far as they could achieve with the barriers they might have faced--not because they were handed a victim's pass to the top.
It hasn't helped for anyone to have helped bring Barack Obama this close to the Presidency of the United States. Any votes cast for him in order to "not appear racist" have helped re-generate one of the biggest racial divides since the 1960s, both within races and between races. But the biased media won't report the real stories being told around the water cooler...
Blacks are threatening "all hell will break lose" if Barack loses. Is that some kind of threat? If so, it is one I have no fear of standing up against. Long before I vote in a candidate because of the color of their skin I will just not vote at all. And since I do not intend to let any man take away my right to vote, I think I'll remain part of that 3% who will vote based on "...the content..." of a man's character. I love America too much to base it on anything less.

"The Patriot"
September 4,2008